How to evaluate decentralized AI compute
Design an AI pilot around reproducible workloads, data boundaries, useful output, and the complete cost of accepted tasks.
Practical guides to Web3, IPFS, Linux, and AI infrastructure. Understand what you control, what you trust, and how to build a more resilient stack.

Start with authority, dependencies, and the boundaries you need to test.
Map your platformConnect static builds, IPFS retention, DNSLink, and a practical rollback plan.
Explore IPFSCompare AI workloads, Linux operations, and the real work behind a server.
Explore AI computeSeventeen focused guides, organized around the decisions a developer or operator actually needs to make.
Map what you control, what you trust, and what you can replace. Start with the application’s dependencies—not its technology labels.
Explore the guideTranslate Web3 terminology into an understandable application design, with explicit identities, state, interfaces, and administrative powers.
Explore the guideDesign the complete application journey—from a readable interface to an authorized action and a trustworthy account of its result.
Explore the guideDefine the mechanism before the ticker. Separate payment, resource access, voting, and rewards from assumptions about investment value.
Explore the guideReview Ethereum as an execution layer inside a complete application. Keep contracts, interfaces, data access, and upgrade powers in the same design.
Explore the guideStudy accounts, programs, instructions, and user authorization before evaluating a Solana application’s wider hosting and operating model.
Explore the guideEvaluate AI compute with a repeatable workload, a clear data boundary, and evidence of useful results—not hardware counts or token narratives.
Explore the guideSeparate model text units, compute entitlements, and transferable tokens. Similar terminology does not make their roles interchangeable.
Explore the guideSeparate a compute marketplace from the machine it supplies. Evaluate resources, administration, persistence, and the work required to rebuild.
Explore the guideBuild an operating baseline around individual access, limited services, maintained software, and a recovery procedure another person can use.
Explore the guideChoose a network boundary you can explain. Review the tunnel, operators, client updates, account relationships, and failure behavior separately.
Explore the guideCompare delivery models around a complete website release. Keep availability, update authority, data retention, and domain control in the decision.
Explore the guideUnderstand the difference between identifying a release and keeping it available. Plan content addressing, retention, gateways, and updates together.
Explore the guideTreat HTTP delivery as its own operating layer. Serve a complete artifact, restrict write authority, and test the behavior readers actually depend on.
Explore the guideLet editors manage content while readers receive a complete static release. Keep preview, review, media, metadata, and publishing authority aligned.
Explore the guideConnect a stable name to a versioned publication without confusing the DNS record, the browser gateway, and the retained content.
Explore the guideProtect the entry point separately from the website files. Review registration, DNS authority, renewals, recovery access, and a consistent public URL.
Explore the guideA contract can distribute execution while a single account still controls the interface. Map the layers before making claims about the whole system.
Our architecture worksheet gives you five review categories—and a practical way to test what remains dependent on one operator.
Map your dependenciesDesign an AI pilot around reproducible workloads, data boundaries, useful output, and the complete cost of accepted tasks.
Rehearse a clean rebuild across content, domains, servers, and application dependencies—without relying on the original delivery path.
Connect a familiar domain to a versioned release while keeping DNS, gateway delivery, and rollback responsibilities separate.
Begin with the tradeoffs that matter. There is no single architecture that removes every dependency.
It is useful to examine how a system distributes control and dependencies across its interface, execution, data, and administrators. Start with the platform architecture guide rather than a single label.
No. Content addressing and ongoing retention are different responsibilities. The IPFS persistence guide explains why someone must continue retaining the content.
No. Everything here is open to read. A token, wallet, or contract should be part of your own architecture only when it serves a specific requirement—not because a guide uses the term Web3.
Define an application rule and a complete user journey first. The dapp comparison guide helps you compare implementation and operating requirements without a universal chain ranking.
Start with a complete static artifact, then compare delivery, retention, domain control, and recovery. Follow the web hosting guide into the IPFS and CMS walkthroughs.
Start with one user journey. Learn the layers. Make the tradeoffs explicit.